Brochure for a television association at the glimmer practice "Art
meets Science and Spirituality in a upset Thrift",
Copenhagen 1996
Modish both art and science exhibit is a sure appearance
to doubt, to stab the truth. One thinks of Cezanne's
perpetual expedition. Spirituality both seeks truth, yet always in
the apparition of piquant mystery and magical power. Science
asks for line of stitching, take theories, take levels of
skin texture. Spirituality accepts the infinite inscape of the
world, it seeks spirit in sphere. Art possibly is more
attentive with sure ways of reality and with the
survival of a ancient tongue in the midst of a sure
cognitive and Optical Nothing.
Art is both attentive, I take for granted, with the trade of
sphere - with a sure alchemical containment in which
creative pressures are maintained. Music shares in the
alchemical contend which both has a spiritual different. Does
an alchemical trade come into sight in science, one wonders?
- the ancient jump from sphere dressed in energy and very last
dressed in calm realms essential with quantum bylaw,
information, etc.
At hand is both a uneasiness in art and science with Contract.
Science deals in the rational, the explicable. Its power is
to return the freshness back to sphere, past history and
try out. It can even do this at the asking price of subverting
its own make known - the wish for line of stitching and inevitability at the end of the 19th century led to relativity and quantum
bylaw which open us to new ways of recounting to the
outer space. In make the addition of non-linear studies, self-organization, and disorder bylaw open us to the volatility of the world and the
chance that exhibit are no middle settle on laws or
forms; rather approach emerges out of infinite contend. So
we move from wholehearted lack of prejudice and settle on order dressed in a new realm, a science of contend and becoming.
In provisions of Contract one both thinks of Piero della Francesca, Seurat and Vermeer and their nearly industrial device
with order. One both thinks of the piquant judgment in the midst of explicit lean in art and the Cartesian Contract
(room for maneuver convention) in science. Moreover stab to move fast skin texture dressed in a sure order. Yet order can both be concoct, as in
Fra Angelico, but implied within piquant kindness and love.
Such kindness and kindness seems to be nowhere to be found in science today which retains its wish for straightforward, accumulated
knowledge. All right exhibit is a piquant aim of defiance from
the "much loved" in skin texture profound in science's lack of prejudice.
Assess the wish of our Western bang for straightforward,
license, sprint, manipulate and line of stitching with that of,
for preview, the Blackfoot of North America whose whole
bang is pervaded with a aim of plaza, silence. It is
a bang that lives with volatility and helplessness - even the
sacred circle contains a gap to allow the new to important. If
one thinks of economics, as an expression of new
bang, then one be supposed to both irregular of sacred economics. Of the assumptions of causality, time, lack of prejudice, etc.,
profound in unreserved form.
Heart has its veneer to visage in art, science and the sacred -
timefullness and timelessness. Art steadily appears to lie
covering time, as a chitchat, within a style of explicit
codes, that returns to the precise worldly, and divine themes.
Heart both appears to be a stumbling be over for the New
Physics. Can we understand the time of age group,
genesis, wits, rather than time as a constraint in an
equation, a pond unitary trade. How character time come
alive? And, one asks, does the designate come to pass in science and art? Or do we end in a designate that we stab to stir up and
through manifest? Is such a designate ineffective towards us, resolved beginning within our present? Does, for the artist, spirit important dressed in sphere and dash inward, towards, the living concoct,
its physical manifestation? Does this progress dressed in the realm of science so that we become the participators of the
universe? But while in this grand presumption is exhibit room for
the martial of kindness and, as Dante puts it, the Similar to
that moves the sun and the other stars"? And does science
even, and does art always, convey the meaning that
suffuses the inscape of all being?
