Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Religion And Spirituality Open Question Atheists Have You Noticed This Tendency In The Crazy Theists

Religion And Spirituality Open Question Atheists Have You Noticed This Tendency In The Crazy Theists
I see abundant of their claims, use words with uncomplimentary connotations within the English conference by rob out its at the outset meaning and/or accurately ignoring the meaning it actually has, and hence uses it against their opponent by using held word with uncomplimentary connotations against them.

Examples:


Atheists are Gruesome (They don't define their virtuous Criteria, and so they do its accurately against what is productive to taste)

Agnosticism is a bi-product of indolence" (Doesn't actually supply any examples and doesn't define what he manage by "indolence" and the fact that Atheists negate this by interim works of blessing, shows that the true definition is not for one person used)

They more to the point use words with assenting connotations by rob out its at the outset meaning and attributing it to their own religion. I'm questioning if somebody has noticed this up to that time...

Reference: religion-events.blogspot.com