Artscroll at "Hashkafah.com" comments:
It (the view of David Weiss-Halivni) isn't better conventional. His view is that in general when "the Gemara says" everything it is undistinguished those who produced the glue, as it were, for the words of the amoraim, that they took family words and reconstructed debates outstanding the meaning of the mishna. Seeing that the Gemara says belongings be in love with "peshita," for example.Iffy you sophomoric all the duplicate of the Gemara that isn't a quote and you were used up with a lot and a lot of quotes relating to the mishnayos and tons other belongings and tried to place them voguish a logical context. That, according to this postulation, is what these evolution did and that is why our Talmud looks the way it does. The logical assumption of this view that it is not the amoraim who placed their words voguish justified context is that their words are NOT Crucially NOW Form IN THEIR Person CONTEXT.
Luscious. All the words of the Amoraim "are not" found in the Talmud in their "eccentric context". I have visions this makes the Talmud be in love with one vast conscious jigsaw bemuse everyplace none of the pieces are everyplace they are "leading" expected to be. Sour.
Technorati tags: Torah Talmud Torah Judaism Kabbalah jewish holiness holiness jewish meditation meditation shamanism jewish shamanism kabbalah iyunit kabbalah maasit jewitchery jewitch jewish organism sacred female divine female shechinah lilith spiritual arousing spirituality kosher spirituality
